linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/7] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit tests for cmd_xfer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220622041040.202737-2-tzungbi@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:10:34 +0000
From:   Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
To:     bleung@...omium.org, groeck@...omium.org
Cc:     chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, tzungbi@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit tests for cmd_xfer_status

cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() calls cros_ec_cmd_xfer() and cros_ec_map_error().

Given that there are already test cases for cros_ec_cmd_xfer(), only add
basic Kunit tests for cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status().

Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
index 7d45e5022221..6464f6101fd3 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
@@ -1964,6 +1964,46 @@ static void cros_ec_proto_test_cmd_xfer_in_progress_return0(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, cros_kunit_ec_pkt_xfer_mock_called, 2);
 }
 
+static void cros_ec_proto_test_cmd_xfer_status_normal(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct cros_ec_proto_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = &priv->ec_dev;
+	struct ec_xfer_mock *mock;
+	int ret;
+	struct cros_ec_command msg;
+
+	memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+
+	/* For cros_ec_cmd_xfer(). */
+	{
+		mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_add(test, 0);
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
+	}
+
+	ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec_dev, &msg);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+}
+
+static void cros_ec_proto_test_cmd_xfer_status_xfer_error(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct cros_ec_proto_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = &priv->ec_dev;
+	struct ec_xfer_mock *mock;
+	int ret;
+	struct cros_ec_command msg;
+
+	memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+
+	/* For cros_ec_cmd_xfer(). */
+	{
+		mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_addx(test, -EPROTO, EC_RES_SUCCESS, 0);
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
+	}
+
+	ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec_dev, &msg);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EPROTO);
+}
+
 static void cros_ec_proto_test_release(struct device *dev)
 {
 }
@@ -2044,6 +2084,8 @@ static struct kunit_case cros_ec_proto_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_cmd_xfer_in_progress_xfer_error),
 	KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_cmd_xfer_in_progress_return_error),
 	KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_cmd_xfer_in_progress_return0),
+	KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_cmd_xfer_status_normal),
+	KUNIT_CASE(cros_ec_proto_test_cmd_xfer_status_xfer_error),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.37.0.rc0.104.g0611611a94-goog