| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220622192710.2547152-16-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:27:02 -0400
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: maz@...nel.org, anup@...infault.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
bgardon@...gle.com, peterx@...hat.com, maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, pfeiner@...gle.com,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dmatlack@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 15/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Allow adding new entries to the rmap and linking shadow pages without a
struct kvm_vcpu pointer by moving the implementation of rmap_add() and
link_shadow_page() into inner helper functions.
No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Message-Id: <20220516232138.1783324-16-dmatlack@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 45a4e85c0b2c..a8cdbe2958d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -673,11 +673,6 @@ static void mmu_free_memory_caches(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
}
-static struct pte_list_desc *mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache);
-}
-
static void mmu_free_pte_list_desc(struct pte_list_desc *pte_list_desc)
{
kmem_cache_free(pte_list_desc_cache, pte_list_desc);
@@ -832,7 +827,7 @@ gfn_to_memslot_dirty_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
/*
* Returns the number of pointers in the rmap chain, not counting the new one.
*/
-static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
+static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *spte,
struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
{
struct pte_list_desc *desc;
@@ -843,7 +838,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
rmap_head->val = (unsigned long)spte;
} else if (!(rmap_head->val & 1)) {
rmap_printk("%p %llx 1->many\n", spte, *spte);
- desc = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
+ desc = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(cache);
desc->sptes[0] = (u64 *)rmap_head->val;
desc->sptes[1] = spte;
desc->spte_count = 2;
@@ -855,7 +850,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
while (desc->spte_count == PTE_LIST_EXT) {
count += PTE_LIST_EXT;
if (!desc->more) {
- desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
+ desc->more = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(cache);
desc = desc->more;
desc->spte_count = 0;
break;
@@ -1556,8 +1551,10 @@ static bool kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
#define RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD 1000
-static void rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
+static void __rmap_add(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
@@ -1566,15 +1563,23 @@ static void rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
sp = sptep_to_sp(spte);
kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn(sp, spte - sp->spt, gfn);
rmap_head = gfn_to_rmap(gfn, sp->role.level, slot);
- rmap_count = pte_list_add(vcpu, spte, rmap_head);
+ rmap_count = pte_list_add(cache, spte, rmap_head);
if (rmap_count > RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD) {
- kvm_unmap_rmapp(vcpu->kvm, rmap_head, NULL, gfn, sp->role.level, __pte(0));
+ kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, rmap_head, NULL, gfn, sp->role.level, __pte(0));
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(
- vcpu->kvm, sp->gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
+ kvm, sp->gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
}
}
+static void rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache;
+
+ __rmap_add(vcpu->kvm, cache, slot, spte, gfn);
+}
+
bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
bool young = false;
@@ -1645,13 +1650,13 @@ static unsigned kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn_t gfn)
return hash_64(gfn, KVM_MMU_HASH_SHIFT);
}
-static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte)
{
if (!parent_pte)
return;
- pte_list_add(vcpu, parent_pte, &sp->parent_ptes);
+ pte_list_add(cache, parent_pte, &sp->parent_ptes);
}
static void mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
@@ -2247,8 +2252,8 @@ static void shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
__shadow_walk_next(iterator, *iterator->sptep);
}
-static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static void __link_shadow_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *sptep,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
u64 spte;
@@ -2258,12 +2263,18 @@ static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
- mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, sptep);
+ mmu_page_add_parent_pte(cache, sp, sptep);
if (sp->unsync_children || sp->unsync)
mark_unsync(sptep);
}
+static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+ __link_shadow_page(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache, sptep, sp);
+}
+
static void validate_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
unsigned direct_access)
{
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists