[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a636d8e0-ad32-5888-acac-671f7f553bb3@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:46:31 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] lib/smp_processor_id: fix imbalanced instrumentation_end()
call
Currently instrumentation_end() won't be called if printk_ratelimit()
returned false.
Fixes: 126f21f0e8d46e2c ("lib/smp_processor_id: Move it into noinstr section")
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
lib/smp_processor_id.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/smp_processor_id.c b/lib/smp_processor_id.c
index 046ac6297c78..a2bb7738c373 100644
--- a/lib/smp_processor_id.c
+++ b/lib/smp_processor_id.c
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ unsigned int check_preemption_disabled(const char *what1, const char *what2)
printk("caller is %pS\n", __builtin_return_address(0));
dump_stack();
- instrumentation_end();
out_enable:
+ instrumentation_end();
preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace();
out:
return this_cpu;
--
2.18.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists