linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: Allow middle optional clocks to be missing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2705069844be7b3152a810e21b9f737a88d0302d.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:10:55 +0800
From:   Wenbin Mei <wenbin.mei@...iatek.com>
To:     Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        "Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@...labora.com>
CC:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, <kernel@...labora.com>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: Allow middle optional
 clocks to be missing

On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 09:57 +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 09:14 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 20/06/2022 17:50, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 20/06/2022 08:59, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2022-06-19 at 14:05 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > > > On 19/06/2022 09:46, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 18:25 -0700, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 17/06/2022 15:29, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> > > > > > > > > The current clock list in the binding doesn't allow
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > one of
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > optional clocks to be missing and a subsequent clock
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > present.
> > > > > > > > > An
> > > > > > > > > example where this is an issue is in mt8192.dtsi,
> > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > has
> > > > > > > > > "sys_ck",
> > > > > > > > > "ref_ck", "xhci_ck" and would cause dtbs_check
> > > > > > > > > warnings.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Change the clock list in a way that allows the middle
> > > > > > > > > optional
> > > > > > > > > clocks to
> > > > > > > > > be missing, while still guaranteeing a fixed order.
> > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > "ref_ck" is
> > > > > > > > > kept
> > > > > > > > > as a const even though it is optional for simplicity,
> > > > > > > > > since it
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > present in all current dts files.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <
> > > > > > > > > nfraprado@...labora.com>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtk-
> > > > > > > > > xhci.yaml       | 9
> > > > > > > > > +++++++--
> > > > > > > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > diff --git
> > > > > > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtk-
> > > > > > > > > xhci.yaml
> > > > > > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtk-
> > > > > > > > > xhci.yaml
> > > > > > > > > index 63cbc2b62d18..99a1b233ec90 100644
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtk-
> > > > > > > > > xhci.yaml
> > > > > > > > > +++
> > > > > > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtk-
> > > > > > > > > xhci.yaml
> > > > > > > > > @@ -80,8 +80,13 @@ properties:
> > > > > > > > >      items:
> > > > > > > > >        - const: sys_ck  # required, the following
> > > > > > > > > ones
> > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > optional
> > > > > > > > >        - const: ref_ck
> > > > > > > > > -      - const: mcu_ck
> > > > > > > > > -      - const: dma_ck
> > > > > > > > > +      - enum:
> > > > > > > > > +          - mcu_ck
> > > > > > > > > +          - dma_ck
> > > > > > > > > +          - xhci_ck
> > > > > > > > > +      - enum:
> > > > > > > > > +          - dma_ck
> > > > > > > > > +          - xhci_ck
> > > > > > > > >        - const: xhci_ck
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > You allow now almost any order here, including
> > > > > > > > incorrect
> > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > sys,ref,xhci,xhci,xhci.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > The order of clocks has to be fixed and we cannot allow
> > > > > > > > flexibility.
> > > > > > > > Are
> > > > > > > > you sure that these clocks are actually optional (not
> > > > > > > > wired to
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > device)?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > In fact, these optional clocks are fixed, due to no gates
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > provided,
> > > > > > > SW can't control them by CCF;
> > > > > > > In this case, I usually use a fixed clock, or ignore it.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > But in some versions these clocks are controllable or not?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Some SoCs are controllable, some ones are not (fixed clock).
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for confirming. Then I would prefer to make these clocks
> > > > required
> > > > (not optional) and always provide them - via common clock
> > > > framework or
> > > > fixed-clock.
> > > 
> > > Hi Krzysztof and Chunfeng,
> > > 
> > > thank you both for the feedback.
> > > 
> > > Since the solution I proposed in this patch is not acceptable I
> > > see
> > > two options:
> > > 1. Split the clocks in several if blocks matched by compatibles
> > > 2. Make the clocks required and use fixed-clock nodes for the
> > > missing clocks in
> > >    the DT
> > > 
> > > My understanding is that 1 is the desirable solution if the clock
> > > is really
> > > missing in some hardware variants, while 2 is desirable if all
> > > hardware variants
> > > really receive all the clocks, only that on some variants they're
> > > fixed and not
> > > controlable by SW.
> > > 
> > > From what I'm reading of this discussion it seems that the latter
> > > is the case
> > > here and thus we should go for 2. Is this correct?
> > 
> > This is how I understood it as well, so correct from my side.
> 
> Also right for me.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also Chunfeng, do you have information on whether the same is
> > > true
> > > for the MMC
> > > HW block? I recently submitted some changes to that binding [1]
> > > but
> > > I followed
> > > approach 1 there instead. However if all the clocks are present
> > > in
> > > the HW level
> > > there as well it would make more sense for me to change it to
> > > follow approach 2.
> 
> I discussed it with Wenbin, MMC seems a little different with USB,
> 
> Hi Wenbin,
> 
>    Please give some comments about MMC, thanks
> 
Hi Chunfeng,

As we discussed, the following change is the desirable solution for the
Mediatek MMC HW.

https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2022-June/043691.html

Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Nícolas
> > > 
> > > [1] 
> > > 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220617230114.2438875-1-nfraprado@collabora.com
> > 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> 
>