lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:27:49 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
        "Joseph S . Barrera III" <joebar@...omium.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add / fix sc7280 board
 bindings

On 20/05/2022 23:38, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> This copy-pastes compatibles from sc7280-based boards from the device
> trees to the yaml file. It also fixes the CRD/IDP bindings which had
> gotten stale.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
> It should be noted that these match the sc7280 boards as of the top of
> the "for-next" branch of the tree
> git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git
> 
> (no changes since v2)
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Use a "description" instead of a comment for each item.

What's the plan for these patches? This is one was reviewed, the 5/5 had
comments. Is there going to be resend or pick up?

Some other folks work depends on this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ