linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memory/tegra: Add missing of_node_get() in tegra_emc_find_node_by_ram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:09:10 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Liang He <windhl@....com>
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory/tegra: Add missing of_node_get() in
 tegra_emc_find_node_by_ram_code

On 22/06/2022 11:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> The patch was not even compiled... I consider it harmful approach. NAK.
>>> See: https://lwn.net/Articles/854645/
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>
>> Sorry, Krzysztof.
>>
>> As the patch is so simple two lines , I thought I can handle it without compiling it.
>>
>> Thanks very much for your notice about the article and I hope I have not done anyother harmful things.
>>
>> And I will take care of my patch code in future no matter how simple it is.
> 
> 
> Never send patches which were not built. It seems you didn't build them
> in the past either, even though setting up cross compile is trivial (few
> commands). QEMU is also an easy option.
> 
> Even though your contribution might be valuable, lack of building is a
> sign for me that approach is not serious, so I am not going to take
> risky code.

Unless of course someone's reviews your code. :)

Best regards,
Krzysztof