linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: r8188eu: Fixed a function declaration coding style issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YrLhv4dqb/Qk+HUU@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:32:47 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Chang Yu <marcus.yu.56@...il.com>
Cc:     Larry.Finger@...inger.net, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: r8188eu: Fixed a function declaration
 coding style issue

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:52:30PM -0700, Chang Yu wrote:
> Added an identifier name for function definition argument
> 'struct timer_list *' as per checkpatch.pl
> 
> Note that for the same line checkpatch.pl will also complain "extern
> should be avoided in .c". I am not very familiar with the codebase
> so I decided not to move the declaration to a header file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chang Yu <marcus.yu.56@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
> index 36ea79586992..7e2f5c2f9111 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static u8 rtw_rfc1042_header[] = {
>         0xaa, 0xaa, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
>  };
>  
> -void rtw_signal_stat_timer_hdl(struct timer_list *);
> +void rtw_signal_stat_timer_hdl(struct timer_list *t);

This really should be a static function, not a global one like this.
That is the correct fix to make, can you do that as an add-on patch?

thanks,

greg k-h