[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrL3DQD92ijLam2V@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:03:41 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, pabeni@...hat.com,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@....com>,
upstream@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH 09/12] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: introduce DSA
description
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> wt., 21 cze 2022 o 13:42 Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> napisaĆ(a):
...
> It's not device on MDIO bus, but the MDIO controller's register itself
> (this _CSR belongs to the parent, subnodes do not refer to it in any
> way). The child device requires only _ADR (or whatever else is needed
> for the case the DSA device is attached to SPI/I2C controllers).
More and more the idea of standardizing the MDIOSerialBus() resource looks
plausible. The _ADR() usage is a bit grey area in ACPI specification. Maybe
someone can also make it descriptive, so Microsoft and others won't utilize
_ADR() in any level of weirdness.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists