lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:27:57 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, yf.wang@...iatek.com
Cc:     Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Libo Kang <Libo.Kang@...iatek.com>,
        "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Ning Li <ning.li@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Fix race condition during iova_domain
 initialization

On 2022-06-22 13:46, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Please re-send with
> 
> 	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> 
> in Cc.

Apologies, I did spot this before, I've just been tied up with other 
things and dropping everything non-critical on the floor, so didn't get 
round to replying before it slipped my mind again.

In summary, I hate it, but mostly because the whole situation of calling 
iommu_probe_device off the back of driver probe is fundamentally broken. 
I'm still a few steps away from fixing that properly, at which point I 
can just as well rip all these little bodges out again. If it really 
does need mitigating in the meantime (i.e. this is real-world async 
probe, not just some contrived testcase), then I can't easily think of 
any cleaner hack, so,

Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>

(somewhat reluctantly)

Cheers,
Robin.

> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 08:07:45PM +0800, yf.wang@...iatek.com wrote:
>> From: Yunfei Wang <yf.wang@...iatek.com>
>>
>> When many devices share the same iova domain, iommu_dma_init_domain()
>> may be called at the same time. The checking of iovad->start_pfn will
>> all get false in iommu_dma_init_domain() and both enter init_iova_domain()
>> to do iovad initialization.
>>
>> Fix this by protecting init_iova_domain() with iommu_dma_cookie->mutex.
>>
>> Exception backtrace:
>> rb_insert_color(param1=0xFFFFFF80CD2BDB40, param3=1) + 64
>> init_iova_domain() + 180
>> iommu_setup_dma_ops() + 260
>> arch_setup_dma_ops() + 132
>> of_dma_configure_id() + 468
>> platform_dma_configure() + 32
>> really_probe() + 1168
>> driver_probe_device() + 268
>> __device_attach_driver() + 524
>> __device_attach() + 524
>> bus_probe_device() + 64
>> deferred_probe_work_func() + 260
>> process_one_work() + 580
>> worker_thread() + 1076
>> kthread() + 332
>> ret_from_fork() + 16
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ning Li <ning.li@...iatek.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunfei Wang <yf.wang@...iatek.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> index 09f6e1c0f9c0..b38c5041eeab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct iommu_dma_cookie {
>>   
>>   	/* Domain for flush queue callback; NULL if flush queue not in use */
>>   	struct iommu_domain		*fq_domain;
>> +	struct mutex			mutex;
>>   };
>>   
>>   static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(iommu_deferred_attach_enabled);
>> @@ -309,6 +310,7 @@ int iommu_get_dma_cookie(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>>   	if (!domain->iova_cookie)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>> +	mutex_init(&domain->iova_cookie->mutex);
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -549,26 +551,33 @@ static int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t base,
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	/* start_pfn is always nonzero for an already-initialised domain */
>> +	mutex_lock(&cookie->mutex);
>>   	if (iovad->start_pfn) {
>>   		if (1UL << order != iovad->granule ||
>>   		    base_pfn != iovad->start_pfn) {
>>   			pr_warn("Incompatible range for DMA domain\n");
>> -			return -EFAULT;
>> +			ret = -EFAULT;
>> +			goto done_unlock;
>>   		}
>>   
>> -		return 0;
>> +		ret = 0;
>> +		goto done_unlock;
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	init_iova_domain(iovad, 1UL << order, base_pfn);
>>   	ret = iova_domain_init_rcaches(iovad);
>>   	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> +		goto done_unlock;
>>   
>>   	/* If the FQ fails we can simply fall back to strict mode */
>>   	if (domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ && iommu_dma_init_fq(domain))
>>   		domain->type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;
>>   
>> -	return iova_reserve_iommu_regions(dev, domain);
>> +	ret = iova_reserve_iommu_regions(dev, domain);
>> +
>> +done_unlock:
>> +	mutex_unlock(&cookie->mutex);
>> +	return ret;
>>   }
>>   
>>   /**
>> -- 
>> 2.18.0
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists