[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0e4adc8-5d67-b76a-d0f1-2df83bd69a82@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:29:35 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Kyung Min Park <kyung.min.park@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/vt-d: Make DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED a config setting
On 2022/6/22 23:05, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:52 AM Baolu Lu<baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2022/6/16 02:36, Steve Wahl wrote:
>>> To support up to 64 sockets with 10 DMAR units each (640), make the
>>> value of DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED adjustable by a config variable,
>>> CONFIG_DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED, and make it's default 1024 when MAXSMP is
>>> set.
>>>
>>> If the available hardware exceeds DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED (previously set
>>> to MAX_IO_APICS, or 128), it causes these messages: "DMAR: Failed to
>>> allocate seq_id", "DMAR: Parse DMAR table failure.", and "x2apic: IRQ
>>> remapping doesn't support X2APIC mode x2apic disabled"; and the system
>>> fails to boot properly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Steve Wahl<steve.wahl@....com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian<kevin.tian@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Note that we could not find a reason for connecting
>>> DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED to MAX_IO_APICS as was done previously. Perhaps
>>> it seemed like the two would continue to match on earlier processors.
>>> There doesn't appear to be kernel code that assumes that the value of
>>> one is related to the other.
>>>
>>> v2: Make this value a config option, rather than a fixed constant. The default
>>> values should match previous configuration except in the MAXSMP case. Keeping the
>>> value at a power of two was requested by Kevin Tian.
>>>
>>> v3: Make the config option dependent upon DMAR_TABLE, as it is not used without this.
>>>
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
>>> include/linux/dmar.h | 6 +-----
>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>> index 39a06d245f12..07aaebcb581d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ config DMAR_PERF
>>> config DMAR_DEBUG
>>> bool
>>>
>>> +config DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED
>>> + int "Number of DMA Remapping Units supported"
>>> + depends on DMAR_TABLE
>>> + default 1024 if MAXSMP
>>> + default 128 if X86_64
>>> + default 64
>> With this patch applied, the IOMMU configuration looks like:
>>
>> [*] AMD IOMMU support
>> <M> AMD IOMMU Version 2 driver
>> [*] Enable AMD IOMMU internals in DebugFS
>> (1024) Number of DMA Remapping Units supported <<<< NEW
>> [*] Support for Intel IOMMU using DMA Remapping Devices
>> [*] Export Intel IOMMU internals in Debugfs
>> [*] Support for Shared Virtual Memory with Intel IOMMU
>> [*] Enable Intel DMA Remapping Devices by default
>> [*] Enable Intel IOMMU scalable mode by default
>> [*] Support for Interrupt Remapping
>> [*] OMAP IOMMU Support
>> [*] Export OMAP IOMMU internals in DebugFS
>> [*] Rockchip IOMMU Support
>>
>> The NEW item looks confusing. It looks to be a generic configurable
>> value though it's actually Intel DMAR specific. Any thoughts?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> baolu
>>
> Would moving it under INTEL_IOMMU at least have it show up below
> "Support for Intel IOMMU using DMA Remapping Devices"? I'm not sure it
> can be better than that, because IRQ_REMAP selects DMAR_TABLE, so we
> can't stick it in the if INTEL_IOMMU section.
It's more reasonable to move it under INTEL_IOMMU, but the trouble is
that this also stands even if INTEL_IOMMU is not configured.
The real problem here is that the iommu sequence ID overflows if
DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED is not big enough. This is purely a software
implementation issue, I am not sure whether user opt-in when building a
kernel package could help a lot here.
If we can't find a better way, can we just step back?
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists