linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 264/264] tcp: drop the hash_32() part from the index calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220623164351.531874591@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:44:17 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 264/264] tcp: drop the hash_32() part from the index calculation

From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>

commit e8161345ddbb66e449abde10d2fdce93f867eba9 upstream.

In commit 190cc82489f4 ("tcp: change source port randomizarion at
connect() time"), the table_perturb[] array was introduced and an
index was taken from the port_offset via hash_32(). But it turns
out that hash_32() performs a multiplication while the input here
comes from the output of SipHash in secure_seq, that is well
distributed enough to avoid the need for yet another hash.

Suggested-by: Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ int __inet_hash_connect(struct inet_time
 
 	net_get_random_once(table_perturb,
 			    INET_TABLE_PERTURB_SIZE * sizeof(*table_perturb));
-	index = hash_32(port_offset, INET_TABLE_PERTURB_SHIFT);
+	index = port_offset & (INET_TABLE_PERTURB_SIZE - 1);
 
 	offset = READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + (port_offset >> 32);
 	offset %= remaining;