linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kconfig: -O3 enablement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2650588.mvXUDI8C0e@sakura.myxoz.lan>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jun 2022 19:00:47 +0200
From:   Miko Larsson <mikoxyzzz@...il.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kconfig: -O3 enablement

On Thursday, 23 June 2022 17:44:57 CEST Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:42 AM Miko Larsson <mikoxyzzz@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 22 June 2022 03:57:34 CEST Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > If you want to say "use this option carefully",
> > > EXPERT might be another option.
> > > 
> > >     depends on ARC || EXPERT
> > 
> > Yeah, this would be a fair compromise, though I think it would be
> > better to use "visible if" instead of "depends on". I can get a v2 of
> > the series together if this is desired.
> 
> Why is "visible if" better than "depends on"?
> 

Technically it most likely doesn't matter, but logically it makes more
sense, since we'd make CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE_O3 be visible if
we're on ARC or if we have EXPERT enabled, instead of depending on
them. But yeah, it probably doesn't matter.

--
~miko