lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 23:38:35 -0500
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To:     Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
Cc:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] memblock tests: add VERBOSE and MEMBLOCK_DEBUG
 Makefile options

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:20:11PM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 08:30:36PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 04:29:05AM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> > > These patches add options VERBOSE and MEMBLOCK_DEBUG to Memblock
> > > simulator, which can be specified when running make. These patches also
> > > implement the functionality for these options.
> > 
> > I seem to be missing patch 3/4 and I don't see it on lore?
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/004e021cc3cb7be8749361b3b1cb324459b9cb9f.1655889641.git.remckee0@gmail.com/
> > 
> > Did it get sent?  Did it define the ASSERT_*() macros?

I see it on lore in both linux-mm and linux-kernel, and here as well:
 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/39c5c97d2b5c1ab88b7bbbf02633f840fd5dfcdf.1655889641.git.remckee0@gmail.com/

> That's strange, my email shows that it was sent to linux-mm@...ck.org and
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org but I'm not seeing it on lore either.
> Should I resend just patch 3/4?

No need to resend.

> For now, you can take a look at v1.  Patch 3 is unchanged from v1, which
> is showing up on lore:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/fe34452209f54287023ccacd666eade81ecd9a24.1655878337.git.remckee0@gmail.com/T/#u
> 
> It does not define the ASSERT_*() macros, that happens in patch 2.
> Patch 3 implements MEMBLOCK_DEBUG.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rebecca
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ