[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACeCKac4eL9++QwbDBKrVTpUzhes=WczqZfh+cFiVgoO4py4MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:08:21 -0700
From: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
bleung@...omium.org, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Nícolas F . R . A . Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>, Allen Chen <allen.chen@....com.tw>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Pin-Yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Xin Ji <xji@...logixsemi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] dt-bindings: usb: Add Type-C switch binding
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:30 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Prashant Malani (2022-06-22 10:34:30)
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..78b0190c8543
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/typec-switch.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: USB Type-C Switch
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + A USB Type-C switch represents a component which routes USB Type-C data
> > + lines to various protocol host controllers (e.g USB, VESA DisplayPort,
> > + Thunderbolt etc.) depending on which mode the Type-C port, port partner
> > + and cable are operating in. It can also modify lane routing based on
> > + the orientation of a connected Type-C peripheral.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: typec-switch
> > +
> > + mode-switch:
> > + type: boolean
> > + description: Specify that this switch can handle alternate mode switching.
> > +
> > + orientation-switch:
> > + type: boolean
> > + description: Specify that this switch can handle orientation switching.
> > +
> > + ports:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> > + description: OF graph binding modelling data lines to the Type-C switch.
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + port@0:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > + description: Link between the switch and a Type-C connector.
>
> Is there an update to the usb-c-connector binding to accept this port
> connection?
Not at this time. I don't think we should enforce that either.
(Type-C data-lines could theoretically be routed through intermediate
hardware like retimers/repeaters)
>
> > +
> > + required:
> > + - port@0
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - ports
> > +
> > +anyOf:
> > + - required:
> > + - mode-switch
> > + - required:
> > + - orientation-switch
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: true
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + drm-bridge {
> > + usb-switch {
> > + compatible = "typec-switch";
>
> I still don't understand the subnode design here. usb-switch as a
> container node indicates to me that this is a bus, but in earlier rounds
> of this series it was stated this isn't a bus.
I am not aware of this as a requirement. Can you please point me to the
documentation that states this needs to be the case?
> Why doesn't it work to
> merge everything inside usb-switch directly into the drm-bridge node?
I attempted to explain the rationale in the previous version [1], but
using a dedicated sub-node means the driver doesn't haven't to
inspect individual ports to determine which of them need switches
registered for them. If it sees a `typec-switch`, it registers a
mode-switch and/or orientation-switch. IMO it simplifies the hardware
device binding too.
It also maps with the internal block diagram for these hardware
components (for ex. the anx7625 crosspoint switch is a separate
sub-block within anx7625).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/CACeCKaeH6qTTdG_huC4yw0xxG8TYEOtfPW3tiVNwYs=P4QVPXg@mail.gmail.com/
>
> > + mode-switch;
> > + orientation-switch;
> > + ports {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + port@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + anx_ep: endpoint {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&typec_controller>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists