[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XoqTeUg9mQLck-fwtFptSqn2eC1htmRkt_b-pih+wqug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:11:48 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: "Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi (Temp)" <vnivarth@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi (Temp) (QUIC)" <quic_vnivarth@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mukesh Savaliya (QUIC)" <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: minor fixes to get_clk_div_rate()
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:58 AM Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi (Temp)
<vnivarth@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For desired_clk = 100 and clock rates like 1st from below, DIV_ROUND_UP seems to cause missing candidate solutions.
>
> static unsigned long clk_round_rate_test(struct clk *clk, unsigned long in_freq)
> {
> //unsigned long root_freq[] = {301, 702, 1004};
> //unsigned long root_freq[] = {301, 702, 1004, 2000, 3000};
> //unsigned long root_freq[] = {50, 97, 99};
> //unsigned long root_freq[] = {50, 97, 99, 200};
> //unsigned long root_freq[] = {92, 110, 193, 230};
> //unsigned long root_freq[] = {92, 110, 193, 230, 300, 401};
> //unsigned long root_freq[] = {92, 110, 193, 230, 295, 296, 297, 401};
> //unsigned long root_freq[] = {92, 110, 193, 230, 295, 296, 297, 300, 401};
> //unsigned long root_freq[] = {197, 198, 199};
> unsigned long root_freq[] = {197, 198, 199, 200};
> int i;
> size_t n = sizeof root_freq / sizeof *root_freq;
>
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> if (root_freq[i] >= in_freq)
> return root_freq[i];
> }
> return root_freq[n-1];
> }
>
> I modified to handle such cases, optimised little and uploaded a patch.
> It seems to work for all the cases like above.
I think it would have been simpler to just change this little section:
/* Save the first (lowest freq) within 2% */
actual_mult = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(freq, desired_clk) * desired_clk;
if (!ser_clk && freq <= actual_mult + two_percent) {
ser_clk = freq;
*clk_div = div;
}
That was the only bug, right? Then you could keep the DIV_ROUND_UP() solution?
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists