[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220623075104.166529-3-martin@kaiser.cx>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:51:04 +0200
From: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
To: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: imx25: make __mx25_clocks_init return void
The __mx25_clocks_init function always returns 0 and its only
caller does not check the return value. Let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
---
changes in v2:
- send the patch to the clk maintainers
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c
index 263409fca1eb..72b30dd7f05f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ enum mx25_clks {
static struct clk *clk[clk_max];
-static int __init __mx25_clocks_init(void __iomem *ccm_base)
+static void __init __mx25_clocks_init(void __iomem *ccm_base)
{
BUG_ON(!ccm_base);
@@ -222,8 +222,6 @@ static int __init __mx25_clocks_init(void __iomem *ccm_base)
imx_register_uart_clocks(6);
imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX25", mx25_revision());
-
- return 0;
}
static void __init mx25_clocks_init_dt(struct device_node *np)
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists