[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09091cc4-f652-0978-bb6a-b63f24fdcf49@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:22:27 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Böszörményi Zoltán <zboszor@...il.com>,
zboszor@...hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: add horkage for M88V29
On 6/23/22 16:47, Böszörményi Zoltán wrote:
> 2022. 02. 08. 9:07 keltezéssel, Damien Le Moal írta:
>> On 2/4/22 21:57, zboszor@...hu wrote:
>>> From: Zoltán Böszörményi <zboszor@...il.com>
>>>
>>> This device is a CF card, or possibly an SSD in CF form factor.
>>> It supports NCQ and high speed DMA.
>>>
>>> While it also advertises TRIM support, I/O errors are reported
>>> when the discard mount option fstrim is used. TRIM also fails
>>> when disabling NCQ and not just as an NCQ command.
>>>
>>> TRIM must be disabled for this device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zoltán Böszörményi <zboszor@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> index 67f88027680a..4a7f58fcc411 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> @@ -4028,6 +4028,7 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry ata_device_blacklist [] = {
>>>
>>> /* devices that don't properly handle TRIM commands */
>>> { "SuperSSpeed S238*", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOTRIM, },
>>> + { "M88V29*", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOTRIM, },
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * As defined, the DRAT (Deterministic Read After Trim) and RZAT
>> Applied to for-5.17-fixes. Thanks !
>
> Thank you. However, I have second thoughts about this patch.
> The device advertises this:
>
> # hdparm -iI /dev/sda
> ...
> Enabled Supported
> * Data Set Management TRIM supported (limit 1 block)
> ...
>
> but the I/O failures always reported higher number of blocks,
> IIRC the attempted number of block was 8 or so.
>
> Can the kernel limit or split TRIM commands according to the
> advertised limit? If not (or not yet) then the quirk is good for now.
Yes, the kernel does that. See the sysfs queue attributes
discard_max_bytes and discard_max_hw_bytes. What are the values for your
device ? I think that the "limit 1 block" indicated by hdparm is simply to
say that the DSM command (to trim the device) accept only at most a 1
block (512 B) list of sectors to trim. That is not the actual trim limit
for each sector range in that list.
>
> Best regards,
> Zoltán Böszörményi
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists