[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7115ff1-2a97-f5a0-a0c2-c7c1064af291@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:24:06 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@...il.com>,
Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>,
Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"speakup@...ux-speakup.org" <speakup@...ux-speakup.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] serial: Consolidate BOTH_EMPTY use
On 23. 06. 22, 10:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> * prom_putchar_wait() should be implemented using
> read_poll_timeout_atomic(), incl. failure/timeout handling.
>
>
> Not sure since it is an early stage and scheduler might not work as
> expected. Conversions to iopoll.h macros bitten us a few times already.
Except _atomic does not use scheduler :).
--
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists