| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:26:45 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Sharma, Shashank" <Shashank.Sharma@....com>
Subject: Re: DMA-buf and uncached system memory
Am 23.06.22 um 10:13 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi Christian
>
> Am 15.02.21 um 09:58 schrieb Christian König:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we are currently working an Freesync and direct scan out from system
>> memory on AMD APUs in A+A laptops.
>>
>> On problem we stumbled over is that our display hardware needs to
>> scan out from uncached system memory and we currently don't have a
>> way to communicate that through DMA-buf.
>>
>> For our specific use case at hand we are going to implement something
>> driver specific, but the question is should we have something more
>> generic for this?
>
> I had a patchset here that extends iosys-map (former dma-buf-map) with
> caching information. I'll post a copy.
Oh, nice. But why on iosys-map? We need that per DMA-buf.
Thanks,
Christian.
>
> Sorry for being late to reply.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>>
>> After all the system memory access pattern is a PCIe extension and as
>> such something generic.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists