lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrQqPhi4+jHZ1WJc@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:54:22 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
        George Wilson <gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com>, gjoyce@....com,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] fs: define a firmware security filesystem
 named fwsecurityfs

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 05:56:47PM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> securityfs is meant for linux security subsystems to expose policies/logs
> or any other information. However, there are various firmware security
> features which expose their variables for user management via kernel.
> There is currently no single place to expose these variables. Different
> platforms use sysfs/platform specific filesystem(efivarfs)/securityfs
> interface as find appropriate. Thus, there is a gap in kernel interfaces
> to expose variables for security features.
> 
> Define a firmware security filesystem (fwsecurityfs) to be used for
> exposing variables managed by firmware and to be used by firmware
> enabled security features. These variables are platform specific.
> Filesystem provides platforms to implement their own underlying
> semantics by defining own inode and file operations.
> 
> Similar to securityfs, the firmware security filesystem is recommended
> to be exposed on a well known mount point /sys/firmware/security.
> Platforms can define their own directory or file structure under this path.
> 
> Example:
> 
> # mount -t fwsecurityfs fwsecurityfs /sys/firmware/security
> 
> # cd /sys/firmware/security/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  fs/Kconfig                   |   1 +
>  fs/Makefile                  |   1 +
>  fs/fwsecurityfs/Kconfig      |  14 +++
>  fs/fwsecurityfs/Makefile     |  10 +++
>  fs/fwsecurityfs/inode.c      | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/fwsecurityfs/internal.h   |  13 +++
>  fs/fwsecurityfs/super.c      | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/fwsecurityfs.h |  29 +++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/magic.h   |   1 +
>  9 files changed, 382 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 fs/fwsecurityfs/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 fs/fwsecurityfs/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 fs/fwsecurityfs/inode.c
>  create mode 100644 fs/fwsecurityfs/internal.h
>  create mode 100644 fs/fwsecurityfs/super.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/fwsecurityfs.h
> 
> diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> index 5976eb33535f..19ea28143428 100644
> --- a/fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ config ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
>  
>  source "fs/configfs/Kconfig"
>  source "fs/efivarfs/Kconfig"
> +source "fs/fwsecurityfs/Kconfig"
>  
>  endmenu
>  
> diff --git a/fs/Makefile b/fs/Makefile
> index 208a74e0b00e..5792cd0443cb 100644
> --- a/fs/Makefile
> +++ b/fs/Makefile
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_F2FS_FS)		+= f2fs/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CEPH_FS)		+= ceph/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PSTORE)		+= pstore/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS)		+= efivarfs/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_FWSECURITYFS)		+= fwsecurityfs/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EROFS_FS)		+= erofs/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VBOXSF_FS)		+= vboxsf/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ZONEFS_FS)		+= zonefs/
> diff --git a/fs/fwsecurityfs/Kconfig b/fs/fwsecurityfs/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f1665511eeb9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/fwsecurityfs/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2022 IBM Corporation
> +# Author: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
> +#
> +
> +config FWSECURITYFS
> +	bool "Enable the fwsecurityfs filesystem"
> +	help
> +	  This will build the fwsecurityfs file system which is recommended
> +	  to be mounted on /sys/firmware/security. This can be used by
> +	  platforms to expose their variables which are managed by firmware.
> +
> +	  If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
> diff --git a/fs/fwsecurityfs/Makefile b/fs/fwsecurityfs/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b9931d180178
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/fwsecurityfs/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2022 IBM Corporation
> +# Author: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
> +#
> +# Makefile for the firmware security filesystem
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_FWSECURITYFS)		+= fwsecurityfs.o
> +
> +fwsecurityfs-objs			:= inode.o super.o
> diff --git a/fs/fwsecurityfs/inode.c b/fs/fwsecurityfs/inode.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5d06dc0de059
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/fwsecurityfs/inode.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 IBM Corporation
> + * Author: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/kobject.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/fs_context.h>
> +#include <linux/mount.h>
> +#include <linux/pagemap.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/namei.h>
> +#include <linux/security.h>
> +#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> +#include <linux/magic.h>
> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
> +#include <linux/fwsecurityfs.h>
> +
> +#include "internal.h"
> +
> +int fwsecurityfs_remove_file(struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +	drop_nlink(d_inode(dentry));
> +	dput(dentry);
> +	return 0;
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwsecurityfs_remove_file);
> +
> +int fwsecurityfs_create_file(const char *name, umode_t mode,
> +					u16 filesize, struct dentry *parent,
> +					struct dentry *dentry,
> +					const struct file_operations *fops)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +	int error;
> +	struct inode *dir;
> +
> +	if (!parent)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	dir = d_inode(parent);
> +	pr_debug("securityfs: creating file '%s'\n", name);

Did you forget to call simple_pin_fs() here or anywhere else?

And this can be just one function with the directory creation file, just
check the mode and you will be fine.  Look at securityfs as an example
of how to make this simpler.

> diff --git a/fs/fwsecurityfs/super.c b/fs/fwsecurityfs/super.c

super.c and inode.c can be in the same file, these are tiny, just make
one file for the filesystem logic.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ