[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8tTtaX2gj7Hc0JLjZcnuQ6BJLveWEtxGuT4fsk=pRa_KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:39:07 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix typo's
Hi Wolfram,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:09 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > > - /* This DMAC cannot handle if buffer is not 128-bytes alignment */
> > > > + /* This DMAC cannot handle if buffer is not 128 byte aligned */
> > >
> > > 128-byte? ;-)
> > >
> > In the previous version of the patch Wolfram never came back on your
> > reply, so I went with 128 byte instead.
>
> I hoped for a native speaker to chime in. I don't care about the '-' but
> maybe we should rephrase it to:
>
> /* This DMAC needs buffers to be 128-byte aligned */
>
> ?
Fine by me, will update and resend a v3.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists