lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de2500c4-fce4-31dc-29bc-aa3007027eb9@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:06:36 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     lizhe.67@...edance.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com
Cc:     lizefan.x@...edance.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] memmap: introduce cmdline parameter "memmap=nn[KMG]$"
 without start addr

On 6/22/22 23:24, lizhe.67@...edance.com wrote:
> In our scenario, we need reserve or alloc large continous memory like
> 256M in machine which have different memory specification at just
> boot phase for a user land process.

Just marking the memory reserved doesn't do any good by itself.  There
must be some *other* kernel code to find this reserved area and make it
available to userspace.

It seems kinda silly to add this to the kernel without also adding the
other half of the solution.  Plus, we don't really even know what this
is for.  Are there other, better solutions?  I certainly can't offer any
because this changelog did not provide a full picture of the problem
this solves.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ