[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <225b0c28-8333-9849-0d7b-2a561fb20ccb@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 23:18:54 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] lib/smp_processor_id: use preemptible() macro
preemptible() is unconditional 0 if CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=n, and is
(preempt_count() == 0 && !irqs_disabled()) if CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
Although check_preemption_disabled() depends on CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y,
the naming implies whether preemption is already disabled. Thus, let's
make check_preemption_disabled() safe even if CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=n.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
lib/smp_processor_id.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/smp_processor_id.c b/lib/smp_processor_id.c
index 046ac6297c78..5bb0783ce038 100644
--- a/lib/smp_processor_id.c
+++ b/lib/smp_processor_id.c
@@ -13,10 +13,7 @@ unsigned int check_preemption_disabled(const char *what1, const char *what2)
{
int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
- if (likely(preempt_count()))
- goto out;
-
- if (irqs_disabled())
+ if (likely(!preemptible()))
goto out;
if (is_percpu_thread())
--
2.18.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists