linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Use new SCMI full message tracing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220623145533.2882688-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:55:33 +0100
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     sudeep.holla@....com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, lukasz.luba@....com,
        james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Use new SCMI full message tracing

Add full message tracing for all transmitted and successfully received SCMI
commands, replies and notifications.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index 8b7ac6663d57..276d3a4fd6b8 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -660,6 +660,11 @@ static void scmi_handle_notification(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 		smp_store_mb(xfer->priv, priv);
 	info->desc->ops->fetch_notification(cinfo, info->desc->max_msg_size,
 					    xfer);
+
+	trace_scmi_msg_dump(xfer->hdr.protocol_id, xfer->hdr.id, "NOTI",
+			    xfer->hdr.seq, xfer->hdr.status,
+			    xfer->rx.buf, xfer->rx.len);
+
 	scmi_notify(cinfo->handle, xfer->hdr.protocol_id,
 		    xfer->hdr.id, xfer->rx.buf, xfer->rx.len, ts);
 
@@ -694,6 +699,12 @@ static void scmi_handle_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 		smp_store_mb(xfer->priv, priv);
 	info->desc->ops->fetch_response(cinfo, xfer);
 
+	trace_scmi_msg_dump(xfer->hdr.protocol_id, xfer->hdr.id,
+			    xfer->hdr.type == MSG_TYPE_DELAYED_RESP ?
+			    "DLYD" : "RESP",
+			    xfer->hdr.seq, xfer->hdr.status,
+			    xfer->rx.buf, xfer->rx.len);
+
 	trace_scmi_rx_done(xfer->transfer_id, xfer->hdr.id,
 			   xfer->hdr.protocol_id, xfer->hdr.seq,
 			   xfer->hdr.type);
@@ -827,6 +838,12 @@ static int scmi_wait_for_message_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 				xfer->state = SCMI_XFER_RESP_OK;
 			}
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xfer->lock, flags);
+
+			/* Trace polled replies. */
+			trace_scmi_msg_dump(xfer->hdr.protocol_id, xfer->hdr.id,
+					    "RESP",
+					    xfer->hdr.seq, xfer->hdr.status,
+					    xfer->rx.buf, xfer->rx.len);
 		}
 	} else {
 		/* And we wait for the response. */
@@ -903,6 +920,10 @@ static int do_xfer(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	trace_scmi_msg_dump(xfer->hdr.protocol_id, xfer->hdr.id, "CMND",
+			    xfer->hdr.seq, xfer->hdr.status,
+			    xfer->tx.buf, xfer->tx.len);
+
 	ret = scmi_wait_for_message_response(cinfo, xfer);
 	if (!ret && xfer->hdr.status)
 		ret = scmi_to_linux_errno(xfer->hdr.status);
-- 
2.32.0