lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31f5f441-eba3-4ffb-cf68-159cd827ade7@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 19:31:18 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: leds: lp50xx: fix LED children names

On 24/06/2022 19:26, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:13:25 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The lp50xx LEDs expects to have single-color LED children with unit
>> addresses.  This is required by the driver and provided by existing
>> DTSes.  Fix the binding to match actual usage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Fixes: dce1452301e7 ("dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family of RGB drivers")
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml | 8 +++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.example.dtb: led-controller@14: multi-led@2:#size-cells:0:0: 0 was expected
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml
> 

This is expected and fixed in:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607075247.58048-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

I did not combine this patch with above patchset because this one is a
fix and might be backported to stable.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ