lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:46:28 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc:     joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org, marcan@...can.st,
        sven@...npeter.dev, robin.murphy@....com, robdclark@...il.com,
        baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        orsonzhai@...il.com, baolin.wang7@...il.com, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
        jean-philippe@...aro.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        kevin.tian@...el.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
        alyssa@...enzweig.io, dwmw2@...radead.org, yong.wu@...iatek.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, vdumpa@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        cohuck@...hat.com, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        chenxiang66@...ilicon.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
        john.garry@...wei.com, yangyingliang@...wei.com,
        jordan@...micpenguin.net, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Remove the domain->ops
 comparison

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 03:28:33PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 01:00:27PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > The domain->ops validation was added, as a precaution, for mixed-driver
> > systems.
> > 
> > Per Robin's remarks,
> > * While bus_set_iommu() still exists, the core code prevents multiple
> >   drivers from registering, so we can't really run into a situation of
> >   having a mixed-driver system:
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/6e1280c5-4b22-ebb3-3912-6c72bc169982@arm.com/
> > 
> > * And there's plenty more significant problems than this to fix; in future
> >   when many can be permitted, we will rely on the IOMMU core code to check
> >   the domain->ops:
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/6575de6d-94ba-c427-5b1e-967750ddff23@arm.com/
> > 
> > So remove the check in VFIO for simplicity.
> 
> As discussed we can't remove this check, multiple iommus on different
> busses are allowed today and VFIO does not restrict its attempts to
> attach a pre-existing domain to a single group or bus.
> 
> Please go back to the original version with the ops check in the core
> code.

Robin convinced me, so never mind :)

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ