linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 05/22] x86/virt/tdx: Prevent hot-add driver managed memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:01:31 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        len.brown@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
        isaku.yamahata@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/22] x86/virt/tdx: Prevent hot-add driver managed
 memory

On 6/22/22 04:16, Kai Huang wrote:
> @@ -1319,6 +1330,10 @@ int __ref add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	ret = arch_memory_add_precheck(nid, start, size, mhp_flags);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

Shouldn't a patch that claims to be only for "driver managed memory" be
patching add_memory_driver_managed()?