linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: kunit: remove duplicate kunit-tool.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGS_qxqOZBr7Ti_pS20Qw3RLH+VjnhR5mDhJ2hyezKSo9Du-ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:58:36 -0700
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: kunit: remove duplicate kunit-tool.rst

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:47 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
> Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> writes:
>
> > The information is duplicated now in run_wrapper.rst, which was added in
> > commit 46201d47d6c4 ("Documentation: kunit: Reorganize documentation
> > related to running tests").
> >
> > You cna compare these pages here:
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.18/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.html
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.18/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.html
> >
> > We should have deleted it in then but it got overlooked.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
>
> So not that long ago these patches were going through Shuah...it seems
> that's not happening anymore?  I can pick up kunit docs patches,
> certainly.  I've taken the silence on these as assent and applied them.

Thanks!

Tbh, I'm not really sure what the status is either.
I saw that 46201d47d6c4 (which added the duplication) went through the
docs tree, so I followed suit for this.

I've been guilty of sending purely doc patches through
Shuah/-kselftest tree before, but that was mostly when there were code
change dependencies.

If it makes it simpler, we could try and agree that all kunit doc
patches go through Shuah going forward?
Shuah, Bredan: thoughts/opinions?

Daniel