[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220624204139.ndyi437ye7c2gl45@mobilestation>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 23:41:39 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v9 2/5] arm: dts: lpc18xx: Harmonize EHCI/OHCI DT
nodes name
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 07:14:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/06/2022 16:16, Serge Semin wrote:
> > In accordance with the Generic EHCI/OHCI bindings the corresponding node
> > name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
> > requires the USB nodes to have the name acceptable by the regexp:
> > "^usb(@.*)?" . Make sure the "generic-ehci" and "generic-ohci"-compatible
> > nodes are correctly named.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> > Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc18xx.dtsi | 4 ++--
>
> You should split the patchset per architecture, because maybe that's why
> no one picks it up?
Each patch is sent out to the corresponding mailing list and the
maintainers. I don't think splitting the patchset into the subsets will
be more efficient especially seeing the initial patchset consisted of
30 patches of which only five left.
I was very busy last year with another activities so what was left of this
patchset was stalling on my local repo all that time. I have been very
surprised to realise that the submitted part still hasn't been merged in for
all that time. So I've got back to resubmitting the series.
* Though the Qualcom dts have been fixed by you lately.
>
> Let me pick up ARM bits through my cleanup series. If anyone objects,
> please let me know.
Ok. Thanks.
-Sergey
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists