[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220624230525.0b78a0e9@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 23:05:25 +0200
From: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Dianlong Li <long17.cool@....com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: use simple i2c probe
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 19:42:49 +0200, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On 12/06/2022 21:23:47+0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Do you have an example of a change requiring id to support RTCs on x86
> > systems?
>
> I checked and your patch is actually fine, the issue I referred to is:
>
> 1c1b3098ae1e ("rtc: pcf85063: add i2c_device_id name matching support")
Ah yes, I see! The changes I’m making are compatible with that (as you
figured out), I’m not removing the id tables, just avoiding calls to
i2c_match_id when they’re not needed. In fact the approach I use for drivers
which do need their id tables is the same as in the commit above, with an
explicit call to i2c_match_id instead of the old-style probe.
Regards,
Stephen
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists