[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220624190819.59df11d3@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 19:08:19 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: possible trace_printk() bug in v5.19-rc1
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:57:23 +0000
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:
> > Yes, I'm sure. I just checked out v5.18 and built it with the
> > same CONFIG. trace_printk() on that kernel generates function
> > names as expected.
>
> I moved my development work to another system, and bisected. The
> result:
>
> 91fb02f31505 ("module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file")
Hmm, right below that it says:
"No functional change."
I'm guessing it may not be as reliably reproducible.
And is this an issue with trace-cmd output or reading the trace file?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists