lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220624053930.GU16517@kadam>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:39:30 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Chang Yu <marcus.yu.56@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
        phil@...lpotter.co.uk, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: combine nested if statements into
 one

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 08:34:54PM -0700, Chang Yu wrote:
> > - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed,
>
> I'm not entirely sure how to fix this. I checked the original patch
> again and the subject and the body looks OK to me. I'm still a newbie so
> I might have missed a couple of things. It would be greatly appreciated
> if someone could point out what's missing.

What's the advantage of combining if statements?  Out of all the if
statements in the kernel why did you pick that one?  Probably it's
because the indenting was wrong, no?

Write the commit message like this:

[PATCH v3] staging: r8188eu: clean up if statement

I noticed that the if statement was strange and the code was indented
too far.  It is cleaner to combine both if statements as well.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ