lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:12:04 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc:     Steven Lee <steven_lee@...eedtech.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Ken Chen <chen.kenyy@...entec.com>,
        linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        David Wang <David_Wang6097@...il.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 7/7] ARM: dts: aspeed: centriq2400: use qcom
 compatible

On 23/06/2022 09:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/06/2022 07:34, Joel Stanley wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 10:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 29 May 2022 12:49:28 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> "qualcomm" is not a documented compatible and instead "qcom" should be
>>>> used.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> What tree did you apply this to? Did you get review from the maintainer?
> 
> Tree was mentioned below.
> 
>>
>> This board is unmaintained and unused. I would prefer it removed
>> rather than meaningless fixes be applied.
> 
> I can drop the patch. I'll send the patch to remove the board.

Does your answer also means that you are planning to take these? I am
going to prepare a pull request to arm-soc so need to know whether to
keep these or not. I don't have any particular need of handling these
patches by myself, but I want the issues to get fixed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ