| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABVgOS=Df6uWE3O82Ypair5fMCA6zOkVQg7tS9Acv+bAiwXhDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:55:37 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kunit: tool: make --kunitconfig repeatable, blindly concat
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 8:12 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> It's come up a few times that it would be useful to have --kunitconfig
> be repeatable [1][2].
>
> This could be done before with a bit of shell-fu, e.g.
> $ find fs/ -name '.kunitconfig' -exec cat {} + | \
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
> or equivalently:
> $ cat fs/ext4/.kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig | \
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
>
> But this can be fairly clunky to use in practice.
>
> And having explicit support in kunit.py opens the door to having more
> config fragments of interest, e.g. options for PCI on UML [1], UML
> coverage [2], variants of tests [3].
> There's another argument to be made that users can just use multiple
> --kconfig_add's, but this gets very clunky very fast (e.g. [2]).
>
> Note: there's a big caveat here that some kconfig options might be
> incompatible. We try to give a clearish error message in the simple case
> where the same option appears multiple times with conflicting values,
> but more subtle ones (e.g. mutually exclusive options) will be
> potentially very confusing for the user. I don't know we can do better.
>
> Note 2: if you want to combine a --kunitconfig with the default, you
> either have to do to specify the current build_dir
> > --kunitconfig=.kunit --kunitconfig=additional.config
> or
> > --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config --kunitconifg=additional.config
> each of which have their downsides (former depends on --build_dir,
> doesn't work if you don't have a .kunitconfig yet), etc.
>
> Example with conflicting values:
> > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin <<EOF
> > CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=n
> > CONFIG_KUNIT=m
> > EOF
> > ...
> > kunit_kernel.ConfigError: Multiple values specified for 2 options in kunitconfig:
> > CONFIG_KUNIT=y
> > vs from /dev/stdin
> > CONFIG_KUNIT=m
> >
> > CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y
> > vs from /dev/stdin
> > # CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is not set
>
> [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2022-June/357616.html
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAFd5g45f3X3xF2vz2BkTHRqOC4uW6GZxtUUMaP5mwwbK8uNVtA@mail.gmail.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CANpmjNOdSy6DuO6CYZ4UxhGxqhjzx4tn0sJMbRqo2xRFv9kX6Q@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> NOTE: this series is based on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220520224200.3764027-1-dlatypov@google.com/
> That patch redoes kunitconfig parsing, so we'd have merge conflicts
> either way we order these.
>
> ---
This looks good, and works for me (and is proving useful already).
I do think we're approaching a level of confusion with the number of
different ways kconfig options are added, so we'll need to update the
documentation once all of these related patches land.
In particular, we now have the following sources of kconfig options:
- defaults in the actual Kconfig files (and, potentially, kernel
architecture defconfigs)
- kunit_tool architecture specific (e.g. qemu_config) Kconfig entries
- the "default" kunitconfig, which is copied into the build dir, and
that copy is only used if --kunitconfig is not passed.
- other kunitconfig(s) passed with --kunitconfig, some of which live
in tools/testing/kunit/configs, some of which live in
subsystem-specific directories
- command-line --kconfig_add options
Exactly when each of these apply, whether they error if they conflict,
or override each other, and when to use them is not always obvious.
Still, it's working pretty well in practice, so I think the solution
is probably going to be having good examples and documentation, and
responding well to any questions.
In any case, the code for this looks good to me -- my only minor
annoyance is the churn renaming kunitconfig_path -> kunitconfig_paths
gives, and that's a temporary inconvenience -- so this is:
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cheers,
-- David
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 13 ++++---
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py | 11 +++++-
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 38 ++++++++++++------
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> index 13bd72e47da8..163f6b8ac464 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> @@ -291,8 +291,9 @@ def add_common_opts(parser) -> None:
> parser.add_argument('--kunitconfig',
> help='Path to Kconfig fragment that enables KUnit tests.'
> ' If given a directory, (e.g. lib/kunit), "/.kunitconfig" '
> - 'will get automatically appended.',
> - metavar='PATH')
> + 'will get automatically appended. If repeated, the files '
> + 'blindly concatenated, which might not work in all cases.',
> + action='append', metavar='PATHS')
> parser.add_argument('--kconfig_add',
> help='Additional Kconfig options to append to the '
> '.kunitconfig, e.g. CONFIG_KASAN=y. Can be repeated.',
> @@ -414,7 +415,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
>
> if not linux:
> linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
> - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> + kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
> arch=cli_args.arch,
> cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
> @@ -440,7 +441,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
>
> if not linux:
> linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
> - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> + kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
> arch=cli_args.arch,
> cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
> @@ -457,7 +458,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
> elif cli_args.subcommand == 'build':
> if not linux:
> linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
> - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> + kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
> arch=cli_args.arch,
> cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
> @@ -476,7 +477,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
> elif cli_args.subcommand == 'exec':
> if not linux:
> linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
> - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> + kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
> arch=cli_args.arch,
> cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py
> index 89443400b17e..05b129030c6e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>
> from dataclasses import dataclass
> import re
> -from typing import Dict, Iterable, Set
> +from typing import Dict, Iterable, List, Set, Tuple
>
> CONFIG_IS_NOT_SET_PATTERN = r'^# CONFIG_(\w+) is not set$'
> CONFIG_PATTERN = r'^CONFIG_(\w+)=(\S+|".*")$'
> @@ -64,6 +64,15 @@ class Kconfig:
> def set_diff(self, other: 'Kconfig') -> Set[KconfigEntry]:
> return set(self._as_entries()) - set(other._as_entries())
>
> + def differing_options(self, other: 'Kconfig') -> List[Tuple[KconfigEntry, KconfigEntry]]:
> + diff = [] # type: List[Tuple[KconfigEntry, KconfigEntry]]
> + for name, value in self._entries.items():
> + b = other._entries.get(name)
> + if b and value != b:
> + pair = (KconfigEntry(name, value), KconfigEntry(name, b))
> + diff.append(pair)
> + return diff
> +
> def merge_in_entries(self, other: 'Kconfig') -> None:
> for name, value in other._entries.items():
> self._entries[name] = value
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> index 6d994bb24999..fc415ff7530e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> @@ -176,6 +176,30 @@ def get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir: str) -> str:
> def get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir: str) -> str:
> return os.path.join(build_dir, OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
>
> +def get_parsed_kunitconfig(build_dir: str,
> + kunitconfig_paths: Optional[List[str]]=None) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
> + if not kunitconfig_paths:
> + path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir)
> + if not os.path.exists(path):
> + shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, path)
> + return kunit_config.parse_file(path)
> +
> + merged = kunit_config.Kconfig()
> +
> + for path in kunitconfig_paths:
> + if os.path.isdir(path):
> + path = os.path.join(path, KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
> + if not os.path.exists(path):
> + raise ConfigError(f'Specified kunitconfig ({path}) does not exist')
> +
> + partial = kunit_config.parse_file(path)
> + diff = merged.differing_options(partial)
> + if diff:
> + diff_str = '\n\n'.join(f'{a}\n vs from {path}\n{b}' for a, b in diff)
> + raise ConfigError(f'Multiple values specified for {len(diff)} options in kunitconfig:\n{diff_str}')
> + merged.merge_in_entries(partial)
> + return merged
> +
> def get_outfile_path(build_dir: str) -> str:
> return os.path.join(build_dir, OUTFILE_PATH)
>
> @@ -221,7 +245,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree:
> self,
> build_dir: str,
> load_config=True,
> - kunitconfig_path='',
> + kunitconfig_paths: Optional[List[str]]=None,
> kconfig_add: Optional[List[str]]=None,
> arch=None,
> cross_compile=None,
> @@ -237,17 +261,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree:
> if not load_config:
> return
>
> - if kunitconfig_path:
> - if os.path.isdir(kunitconfig_path):
> - kunitconfig_path = os.path.join(kunitconfig_path, KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
> - if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path):
> - raise ConfigError(f'Specified kunitconfig ({kunitconfig_path}) does not exist')
> - else:
> - kunitconfig_path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir)
> - if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path):
> - shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, kunitconfig_path)
> -
> - self._kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kunitconfig_path)
> + self._kconfig = get_parsed_kunitconfig(build_dir, kunitconfig_paths)
> if kconfig_add:
> kconfig = kunit_config.parse_from_string('\n'.join(kconfig_add))
> self._kconfig.merge_in_entries(kconfig)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> index 3a8f638ff092..e21ae1331350 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> @@ -356,17 +356,46 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
>
> def test_invalid_kunitconfig(self):
> with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'nonexistent.* does not exist'):
> - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path='/nonexistent_file')
> + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=['/nonexistent_file'])
>
> def test_valid_kunitconfig(self):
> with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile('wt') as kunitconfig:
> - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=kunitconfig.name)
> + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[kunitconfig.name])
>
> def test_dir_kunitconfig(self):
> with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir:
> with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w'):
> pass
> - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir)
> + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir])
> +
> + def test_multiple_kunitconfig(self):
> + want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig()
> + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT', 'y')
> + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT_TEST', 'm')
> +
> + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir:
> + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig')
> + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f:
> + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
> + with open(other, 'w') as f:
> + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m')
> + pass
> +
> + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other])
> + self.assertFalse(want_kconfig.set_diff(tree._kconfig))
> +
> +
> + def test_multiple_kunitconfig_invalid(self):
> + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir:
> + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig')
> + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f:
> + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
> + with open(other, 'w') as f:
> + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=m')
> +
> + with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, '(?s)Multiple values.*CONFIG_KUNIT'):
> + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other])
> +
>
> def test_kconfig_add(self):
> want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig()
> @@ -637,7 +666,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig'])
> # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
> mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
> - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
> + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'],
> kconfig_add=None,
> arch='um',
> cross_compile=None,
> @@ -649,19 +678,32 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig'])
> # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
> mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
> - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
> + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'],
> kconfig_add=None,
> arch='um',
> cross_compile=None,
> qemu_config_path=None)
>
> + @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree')
> + def test_run_multiple_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init):
> + mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock
> + kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig', '--kunitconfig=other'])
> + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
> + mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
> + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig', 'other'],
> + kconfig_add=None,
> + arch='um',
> + cross_compile=None,
> + qemu_config_path=None)
> +
> +
> @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree')
> def test_run_kconfig_add(self, mock_linux_init):
> mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock
> kunit.main(['run', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KCSAN=y'])
> # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
> mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
> - kunitconfig_path=None,
> + kunitconfig_paths=None,
> kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'],
> arch='um',
> cross_compile=None,
> --
> 2.37.0.rc0.104.g0611611a94-goog
>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4003 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists