linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: kfence: skip kmemleak alloc in kfence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:28:08 +0200
From:   Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To:     Yee Lee <yee.lee@...iatek.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "open list:KFENCE" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: kfence: skip kmemleak alloc in kfence_pool

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 10:20, 'Yee Lee' via kasan-dev
<kasan-dev@...glegroups.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 13:59 +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 13:20, yee.lee via kasan-dev
> > <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Yee Lee <yee.lee@...iatek.com>
> > >
> > > Use MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE to skip kmemleak registration when
> > > the kfence pool is allocated from memblock. And the kmemleak_free
> > > later can be removed too.
> >
> > Is this purely meant to be a cleanup and non-functional change?
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yee Lee <yee.lee@...iatek.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >  mm/kfence/core.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/kfence/core.c b/mm/kfence/core.c
> > > index 4e7cd4c8e687..0d33d83f5244 100644
> > > --- a/mm/kfence/core.c
> > > +++ b/mm/kfence/core.c
> > > @@ -600,14 +600,6 @@ static unsigned long kfence_init_pool(void)
> > >                 addr += 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > -       /*
> > > -        * The pool is live and will never be deallocated from this
> > > point on.
> > > -        * Remove the pool object from the kmemleak object tree, as
> > > it would
> > > -        * otherwise overlap with allocations returned by
> > > kfence_alloc(), which
> > > -        * are registered with kmemleak through the slab post-alloc
> > > hook.
> > > -        */
> > > -       kmemleak_free(__kfence_pool);
> >
> > This appears to only be a non-functional change if the pool is
> > allocated early. If the pool is allocated late using page-alloc, then
> > there'll not be a kmemleak_free() on that memory and we'll have the
> > same problem.
>
> Do you mean the kzalloc(slab_is_available) in memblock_allc()? That
> implies that MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE has no guarantee skipping
> kmemleak_alloc from this. (Maybe add it?)

No, if KFENCE is initialized through kfence_init_late() ->
kfence_init_pool_late() -> kfence_init_pool().