lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:26:56 +0800
From:   Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To:     "Paul A. Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>
CC:     <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        <jolsa@...nel.org>, <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/13] perf: Add perf kwork

Hello,

On 2022/6/23 22:25, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 09:02:45AM +0800, Yang Jihong wrote:
>> On 2022/6/22 22:59, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:45:52PM +0800, Yang Jihong wrote:
>>>> Sometimes, we need to analyze time properties of kernel work such as irq,
>>>> softirq, and workqueue, such as delay and running time of specific interrupts.
>>>> Currently, these events have kernel tracepoints, but perf tool does not
>>>> directly analyze the delay of these events
>>>>
>>>> The perf-kwork tool is used to trace time properties of kernel work
>>>> (such as irq, softirq, and workqueue), including runtime, latency,
>>>> and timehist, using the infrastructure in the perf tools to allow
>>>> tracing extra targets
>>>>
>>>> test case:
>>>>
>>>>     # perf kwork report
>>>>
>>>>       Kwork Name                | Cpu  | Total Runtime | Frequency | Max runtime   | Max runtime start   | Max runtime end     |
>>>>      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>       (s)RCU:9                  | 0007 |      3.488 ms |      1258 |      0.145 ms |    3398384.220013 s |    3398384.220157 s |
>>>>       (s)NET_RX:3               | 0003 |      1.866 ms |       156 |      0.042 ms |    3398385.629764 s |    3398385.629806 s |
>>>>       (s)TIMER:1                | 0000 |      1.799 ms |       117 |      0.055 ms |    3398385.568033 s |    3398385.568088 s |
>>>>       (w)0xffff9c66e563ee98     | 0006 |      1.561 ms |         5 |      0.351 ms |    3398384.060021 s |    3398384.060371 s |
>>>
>>> What units are used for "Frequency"? It would be helpful to include somewhere.
> 
>> This refers to the number of event in the trace period.
> 
> I see. I suggest changing the column heading to say that.
> "Count", "Number of Events", "Occurrences", something like that.
> 
> "Frequency" is a count-per-time-unit, like hertz, which doesn't
> match well here.

OK, I'll fix in next version.

Thanks,
Jihong

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ