| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:33:57 +0800
From: Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@...onical.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 33/33] selftests/bpf: Add test for reg2btf_ids out of
bounds access
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 6:47 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
>
> commit 13c6a37d409db9abc9c0bfc6d0a2f07bf0fff60e upstream.
>
> This test tries to pass a PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL to the release function,
> which would trigger a out of bounds access without the fix in commit
> 45ce4b4f9009 ("bpf: Fix crash due to out of bounds access into reg2btf_ids.")
> but after the fix, it should only index using base_type(reg->type),
> which should be less than __BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX, and also not permit any
> type flags to be set for the reg->type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220220023138.2224652-1-memxor@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,25 @@
> .errstr = "R0 min value is outside of the allowed memory range",
> },
> {
> + "calls: trigger reg2btf_ids[reg->type] for reg->type > __BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX",
> + .insns = {
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
> + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0),
> + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
> + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
> + BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> + },
> + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
> + .result = REJECT,
> + .errstr = "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT prog_test_ref_kfunc must point",
> + .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
> + { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
> + { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 5 },
> + },
> +},
> +{
> "calls: overlapping caller/callee",
> .insns = {
> BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 0),
>
>
Hello Greg,
When I tried to build the bpf selftest from 5.15.49 source tree on a
Ubuntu Jammy instance running with 5.15.49-051549-generic, I got the
following error message:
In file included from
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/tests.h:21,
from test_verifier.c:432:
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:124:10:
error: ‘struct bpf_test’ has no member named ‘fixup_kfunc_btf_id’
124 | .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:124:9:
warning: braces around scalar initializer
124 | .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
| ^
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:124:9:
note: (near initialization for ‘tests[150].errstr_unpriv’)
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:125:17:
warning: braces around scalar initializer
125 | { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
| ^
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:125:17:
note: (near initialization for ‘tests[150].errstr_unpriv’)
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:125:50:
warning: excess elements in scalar initializer
125 | { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
| ^
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:125:50:
note: (near initialization for ‘tests[150].errstr_unpriv’)
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:126:17:
warning: braces around scalar initializer
126 | { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 5 },
| ^
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:126:17:
note: (near initialization for ‘tests[150].errstr_unpriv’)
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:126:50:
warning: excess elements in scalar initializer
126 | { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 5 },
| ^
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:126:50:
note: (near initialization for ‘tests[150].errstr_unpriv’)
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:126:17:
warning: excess elements in scalar initializer
126 | { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 5 },
| ^
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c:126:17:
note: (near initialization for ‘tests[150].errstr_unpriv’)
make: *** [Makefile:508:
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier] Error 1
Which is introduced by this commit f59e6886c "selftests/bpf: Add test
for reg2btf_ids out of bounds access" on 5.15. With this commit
reverted, there will be another error in progs/timer_crash.c like in
5.10 [1]:
progs/timer_crash.c:8:19: error: field has incomplete type 'struct bpf_timer'
struct bpf_timer timer;
^
/home/ubuntu/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_helper_defs.h:39:8:
note: forward declaration of 'struct bpf_timer'
struct bpf_timer;
^
1 error generated.
Maybe commit "selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_timer overwriting crash"
should be reverted on 5.15 as well.
Thanks
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg542618.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists