linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 01/17] x86/cpufeatures: Introduce x2AVIC CPUID bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:08:22 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mlevitsk@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
        jon.grimm@....com, wei.huang2@....com, terry.bowman@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/17] x86/cpufeatures: Introduce x2AVIC CPUID bit

On 5/19/22 12:26, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Introduce a new feature bit for virtualized x2APIC (x2AVIC) in
> CPUID_Fn8000000A_EDX [SVM Revision and Feature Identification].
> 
> Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index 1d6826eac3e6..2721bd1e8e1e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@
>   #define X86_FEATURE_AVIC		(15*32+13) /* Virtual Interrupt Controller */
>   #define X86_FEATURE_V_VMSAVE_VMLOAD	(15*32+15) /* Virtual VMSAVE VMLOAD */
>   #define X86_FEATURE_VGIF		(15*32+16) /* Virtual GIF */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_X2AVIC		(15*32+18) /* Virtual x2apic */
>   #define X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL		(15*32+20) /* Virtual SPEC_CTRL */
>   #define X86_FEATURE_SVME_ADDR_CHK	(15*32+28) /* "" SVME addr check */
>   

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>