[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3013994a-487c-56eb-42d6-b8cdf7615405@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:31:22 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Arend Van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>
CC: <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
<SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] brcmfmac: Remove #ifdef guards for PM related
functions
On 6/24/2022 2:24 AM, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 6/23/2022 2:42 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
[snip]
>> - if (sdiodev->freezer) {
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && sdiodev->freezer) {
>
> This change is not necessary. sdiodev->freezer will be NULL when
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled.
but won't the compiler be able to completely optimize the code away if
the change is present?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists