linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/16] mm/huge_memory: fix comment of page_deferred

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YrXvtRSm0koKa89w@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:09:09 -0700
From:   Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shy828301@...il.com, willy@...radead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] mm/huge_memory: fix comment of page_deferred_list

On 23 Jun 20:26, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/6/23 15:24, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 01:06:25AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> The current comment is confusing because if global or memcg deferred list
> >> in the second tail page is occupied by compound_head, why we still use
> >> page[2].deferred_list here? I think it wants to say that Global or memcg
> >> deferred list in the first tail page is occupied by compound_mapcount and
> >> compound_pincount so we use the second tail page's deferred_list instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> >> ---
> >>  include/linux/huge_mm.h | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> >> index 12b297f9951d..2e8062b3417a 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> >> @@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
> >>  static inline struct list_head *page_deferred_list(struct page *page)
> >>  {
> >>  	/*
> >> -	 * Global or memcg deferred list in the second tail pages is
> >> -	 * occupied by compound_head.
> >> +	 * Global or memcg deferred list in the first tail page is
> >> +	 * occupied by compound_mapcount and compound_pincount.
> >>  	 */
> > 
> > The structure of "struct page" seems to have told us the information that
> > we resue the 2nd tail page to be used as deferred_list. I am not sure the
> 
> Yes, it does.
> 
> > value of those comments. Maybe better to remove them?
> 
> IMHO above comment tries to tell us why deferred list in the second tail page is used
> instead of first tail page. But it should be fine to remove the above comments as they
> don't seem to provide much info (thought I'm not really sure).
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Just a suggestion - feel free to disregard. Maybe we don't need to repeat the
comments in struct page, but maybe a "see organization of tail pages of compound
page in "struct page" definition" would at least point new people to where this
magic 2 comes from.  Maybe an obvious place to check after you're familiar with
overloading struct page data for compound pages - but IMO it's not obvious for
newcomers.

> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> >>  	return &page[2].deferred_list;
> >>  }
> >> -- 
> >> 2.23.0
> >>
> >>
> > .
> > 
>