[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvWBKvUAOiKc=O2HGOT500_innDhhbOfgUH4cdXfW7kbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 19:03:40 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.125-rc1 review
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 22:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.125-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.125-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 99120abeed34b4814d3c0b4443283075bb65646c
* git describe: v5.10.123-96-g99120abeed34
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.123-96-g99120abeed34
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.123-85-g1432bd558ac0)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.123-85-g1432bd558ac0)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.123-85-g1432bd558ac0)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.123-85-g1432bd558ac0)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 133307, pass: 119577, fail: 254, skip: 12678, xfail: 798
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 314 total, 314 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 58 total, 58 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 56 total, 55 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists