linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: Remove is_valid_bpf_tramp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220625161255.547944-2-xukuohai@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:12:52 -0400
From:   Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>,
        Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/4] bpf: Remove is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags()

Before generating bpf trampoline, x86 calls is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags()
to check the input flags. This check is architecture independent.
So, to be consistent with x86, arm64 should also do this check
before generating bpf trampoline.

However, the BPF_TRAMP_F_XXX flags are not used by user code and the
flags argument is almost constant at copmile time, so this run time
check is a bit redundant.

Remove is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() and add some comments to the usage of
BPF_TRAMP_F_XXX flags, as suggested by Alexei.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 --------------------
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c |  3 +++
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c     |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 2c51ca9f7cec..4f8938db03b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1927,23 +1927,6 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static bool is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(unsigned int flags)
-{
-	if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS) &&
-	    (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME))
-		return false;
-
-	/*
-	 * BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops,
-	 * and it must be used alone.
-	 */
-	if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET) &&
-	    (flags & ~BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET))
-		return false;
-
-	return true;
-}
-
 /* Example:
  * __be16 eth_type_trans(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
  * its 'struct btf_func_model' will be nr_args=2
@@ -2022,9 +2005,6 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 	if (nr_args > 6)
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
 
-	if (!is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(flags))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	/* Generated trampoline stack layout:
 	 *
 	 * RBP + 8         [ return address  ]
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 7e0068c3399c..84b2d9dba79a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -341,6 +341,9 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks,
 
 	tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].links[0] = link;
 	tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].nr_links = 1;
+	/* BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops,
+	 * and it must be used alone.
+	 */
 	flags = model->ret_size > 0 ? BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET : 0;
 	return arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(NULL, image, image_end,
 					   model, flags, tlinks, NULL);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 93c7675f0c9e..bd3f2e673874 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -358,6 +358,9 @@ static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
 
 	if (tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT].nr_links ||
 	    tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN].nr_links)
+		/* NOTE: BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS and BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME
+		 * should not be set together.
+		 */
 		flags = BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG | BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME;
 
 	if (ip_arg)
-- 
2.30.2