linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom-scm: convert to dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46ec1f38-dcbe-f87c-4f37-999d24eec522@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:10:00 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>,
        David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom-scm: convert to dtschema

On 25/06/2022 10:50, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 11:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 23/06/2022 20:25, Robert Marko wrote:
>>> Convert bindings for Qualcomm SCM to dtschema.
>>>
>>> SoC compatibles that were used, but not documented were added.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
>>
>> This was already submitted:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211218194038.26913-1-david@ixit.cz/
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> I was not aware there was already a version sent, just used linux-next
> as the base


lore and "dfn" keyword. Several people are working on Qualcomm bindings,
so that's the only way to check it.

> and it wasn't there so I assumed, will search through the archives next time.
> 
> Anyway, that attempt looks abandoned.

Let's give few days to David to respond and to re-submit. If he does, I
am for FIFO approach. If David does not resubmits, then check the review
he got to be sure there is no need for same feedback.


Best regards,
Krzysztof