lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM+2EuJWEOn-Vtaox=G3zXcd+zpx=mAhY1YHuNJx2XpAyPB1xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jun 2022 18:51:54 +0530
From:   Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iio: Add new event type gesture and use direction
 for single and double tap

Hi Jonathan,

Sorry for the delay in replying.

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 6:15 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:47:05 +0530
> Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Add new event type for tap called gesture and the direction can be used
> > to differentiate single and double tap. This may be used by accelerometer
> > sensors to express single and double tap events. For directional tap,
> > modifiers like IIO_MOD_(X/Y/Z) can be used along with singletap and
> > doubletap direction.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> With fresh eyes I think we need to rethink the use of _period to make sure
> we have 'space' for another very like ABI element which is the maximum
> time between events for them to be considered a double tap.
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/iio/industrialio-event.c        |  5 ++++-
> >  include/uapi/linux/iio/types.h          |  3 +++
> >  tools/iio/iio_event_monitor.c           |  8 +++++++-
> >  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > index 3e00d7f7ee22..4eaf85e01911 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > @@ -2035,3 +2035,27 @@ Description:
> >               Available range for the forced calibration value, expressed as:
> >
> >               - a range specified as "[min step max]"
> > +
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_singletap_en
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_doubletap_en
> > +KernelVersion:       5.19
> > +Contact:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> > +Description:
> > +             Device generates an event on a single or double tap.
> > +
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_singletap_value
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_doubletap_value
> > +KernelVersion:       5.19
> > +Contact:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> > +Description:
> > +             Specifies the threshold value that the device is comparing
> > +             against to generate the tap gesture event. Units and exact
> > +             meaning of value are device specific.
>
> I'm fine with this one being device specific, as likely a complex alg
> involved.
>
> > +
> > +What:                /sys/.../events/in_accel_gesture_doubletap_period
> > +KernelVersion:       5.19
> > +Contact:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> > +Description:
> > +             Minimum time period between before and after the double tap
> > +             event. Units and exact meaning of period value are device
> > +             specific.
>
> I think the units need to be standard.  Also would this work better
> as a description?
>
>         Minimum time in seconds between the two taps making up a double
>         tap event.

The values for the time between the two taps are not in terms of seconds,
here period value is in terms of data samples which depends on
the data rate.

>
> Raises a question though. How would we specify the maximum time? I.e.
> if taps are further apart than Xseconds, they are reported as two single
> taps.
>
> Maybe reusing period here isn't a good idea and we need to have new ABI for
> this?
>
>
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ