linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom-scm: convert to dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOX2RU4zhtwacgWWwZehnRBXw9qUgVPdfOexOWeKSxe-tt=ZHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jun 2022 15:41:07 +0200
From:   Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom-scm: convert to dtschema

On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 at 22:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2022 10:50, Robert Marko wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 11:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23/06/2022 20:25, Robert Marko wrote:
> >>> Convert bindings for Qualcomm SCM to dtschema.
> >>>
> >>> SoC compatibles that were used, but not documented were added.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
> >>
> >> This was already submitted:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211218194038.26913-1-david@ixit.cz/
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > I was not aware there was already a version sent, just used linux-next
> > as the base
>
>
> lore and "dfn" keyword. Several people are working on Qualcomm bindings,
> so that's the only way to check it.
>
> > and it wasn't there so I assumed, will search through the archives next time.
> >
> > Anyway, that attempt looks abandoned.
>
> Let's give few days to David to respond and to re-submit. If he does, I
> am for FIFO approach. If David does not resubmits, then check the review
> he got to be sure there is no need for same feedback.

I see that David sent a v2 today, I'm just glad to get this converted.

Regards,
Robert
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof