[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d2ce082-821e-13d2-f2b0-8a0ba00470b0@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 22:56:29 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rapidio/tsi721: Replace flush_scheduled_work() with
flush_work().
Is this change correct?
On 2022/06/12 22:31, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Since "struct tsi721_device" is per a device struct, I assume that
> tsi721_remove() needs to wait for only two works associated with that
> device. Therefore, wait for only these works using flush_work().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> Use flush_work() instead of introducing a dedicated WQ.
>
> Please see commit c4f135d643823a86 ("workqueue: Wrap flush_workqueue()
> using a macro") for background.
>
> drivers/rapidio/devices/tsi721.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rapidio/devices/tsi721.c b/drivers/rapidio/devices/tsi721.c
> index b3134744fb55..0a42d6a2af24 100644
> --- a/drivers/rapidio/devices/tsi721.c
> +++ b/drivers/rapidio/devices/tsi721.c
> @@ -2941,7 +2941,8 @@ static void tsi721_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> tsi721_disable_ints(priv);
> tsi721_free_irq(priv);
> - flush_scheduled_work();
> + flush_work(&priv->idb_work);
> + flush_work(&priv->pw_work);
> rio_unregister_mport(&priv->mport);
>
> tsi721_unregister_dma(priv);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists