[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220626211012.aurhmgdolvt6vnbt@moria.home.lan>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 17:10:12 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC[ Alloc in vsprintf
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 02:02:31PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Because the stack use in _this_ function is quite large.
> Backporting to stable would be trivial.
> No so with printbufs.
Yeah, I'm not so sure "do what's easiest to backport to stable" makes any sense
to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists