linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] perf/marvell_cn10k: Add MPAM support for TAD PMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB5017CB19D896DADFCEAB6ED6D6B99@PH0PR18MB5017.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:18:36 +0000
From:   Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@...vell.com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC:     "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
        Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
        Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>,
        Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
        "james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] perf/marvell_cn10k: Add MPAM support for TAD PMU

Hi Will and Robin,

> On 2022-06-24 13:14, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 12:26:47AM +0530, Tanmay Jagdale wrote:
> >> The TAD PMU supports following counters that can be filtered by MPAM
> >> partition id.
> >>      - (0x1a) tad_alloc_dtg : Allocations to DTG.
> >>      - (0x1b) tad_alloc_ltg : Allocations to LTG.
> >>      - (0x1c) tad_alloc_any : Total allocations to DTG/LTG.
> >>      - (0x1d) tad_hit_dtg   : DTG hits.
> >>      - (0x1e) tad_hit_ltg   : LTG hits.
> >>      - (0x1f) tad_hit_any   : Hit in LTG/DTG.
> >>      - (0x20) tad_tag_rd    : Total tag reads.
> >>
> >> Add a new 'partid' attribute of 16-bits to get the partition id
> >> passed from perf tool. This value would be stored in config1 field
> >> of perf_event_attr structure.
> >>
> >> Example:
> >> perf stat -e tad/tad_alloc_any,partid=0x12/ <program>
> >>
> >> - Drop read of TAD_PRF since we don't have to preserve any
> >>    bit fields and always write an updated value.
> >> - Update register offsets of TAD_PRF and TAD_PFC.
> >
> > It would be great if you could document some of this under
> > Documentation/admin-guide/perf like many of the other PMU drivers have
> > done.
> 
> Especially documenting how the user obtains the required partid value to
> pass.
> 
We created MPAM partitions using the resctrl filesystem interface.
Example:
        $ cd /sys/fs/resctrl
        $ mkdir p1
        $ echo "L3:0=f" > p1/schemata (configure 4 L3 cache ways)
        $ mkdir p2
        $ echo "L3:1=ff0" > p2/schemata (configure 8 L3 cache ways)

Here directory name 'p1' creates a MPAM partid 0x1 and 'p2' creates
0x2 and so on.

Right now, there is no file which exposes the partid to userspace.
We must rely on the sequential order in which we create partitions
via resctrl and use that to derive the partid.

I'll send out a V2 documenting this.
> Thanks,
> Robin.
> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@...vell.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> b/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> >> index 282d3a071a67..f552e6bffcac 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> >> @@ -18,10 +18,12 @@
> >>   #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> >>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>
> >> -#define TAD_PFC_OFFSET		0x0
> >> +#define TAD_PFC_OFFSET		0x800
> >>   #define TAD_PFC(counter)	(TAD_PFC_OFFSET | (counter << 3))
> >> -#define TAD_PRF_OFFSET		0x100
> >> +#define TAD_PRF_OFFSET		0x900
> >>   #define TAD_PRF(counter)	(TAD_PRF_OFFSET | (counter << 3))
> >> +#define TAD_PRF_MATCH_PARTID	(1 << 8)
> >> +#define TAD_PRF_PARTID_NS	(1 << 10)
> >>   #define TAD_PRF_CNTSEL_MASK	0xFF
> >>   #define TAD_MAX_COUNTERS	8
> >>
> >> @@ -86,23 +88,32 @@ static void tad_pmu_event_counter_start(struct
> perf_event *event, int flags)
> >>   	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> >>   	u32 event_idx = event->attr.config;
> >>   	u32 counter_idx = hwc->idx;
> >> +	u32 partid_filter = 0;
> >>   	u64 reg_val;
> >> +	u32 partid;
> >>   	int i;
> >>
> >>   	hwc->state = 0;
> >>
> >> +	/* Extract the partid (if any) passed by user */
> >> +	partid = event->attr.config1 & 0x3f;
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>   PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-7");
> >> +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(partid, "config1:0-15");
> >
> > This doesn't seem to match the mask used above?
ACK.
I will send out a V2 that includes this fix.

Thanks,
Tanmay
> >
> > Will
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org