linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] Add support for HiSilicon PCIe Tune and Trace device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e737393a-56dd-7d24-33d3-e935b14ba758@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 21:25:42 +0800
From:   Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        <suzuki.poulose@....com>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        <robin.murphy@....com>, <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <joro@...tes.org>,
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <john.garry@...wei.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <prime.zeng@...wei.com>,
        <liuqi115@...wei.com>, <james.clark@....com>,
        <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] Add support for HiSilicon PCIe Tune and Trace
 device

On 2022/6/27 21:12, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 07:18:12PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Since the kernel side of this device has been reviewed for 8 versions with
>> all comments addressed and no more comment since v9 posted in 5.19-rc1,
>> is it ok to merge it first (for Patch 1-3 and 7-8)?
> 
> I am not the maintainer of this subsystem, so I do not understand why
> you are asking me :(
> 

I checked the log of drivers/hwtracing and seems patches of coresight/intel_th/stm
applied by different maintainers and I see you applied some patches of intel_th/stm.
Should any of these three maintainers or you can help applied this?

Thanks.