[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrmwJyueoz1Z4ti0@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:27:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: break out of wait loops on kthread_stop()
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 02:00:20PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> +bool __kthread_should_stop(struct task_struct *k)
> +{
> + return (k->flags & PF_KTHREAD) &&
> + test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &to_kthread(k)->flags);
> +}
This used to be a racy pattern; not sure it still is since Eric poked at
this last, but please use __to_kthread() instead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists